Here is a follow-up on the last story I posted concerning Ed Snowden.
The article:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/21/charges-reportedly-filed-against-nsa-secrets-leaker/
Vocabulary to help you understand the article:
to file charges - the verb 'file' is often used in regard to legal matters. A person can 'file' a law suit if he/she wants to sue someone. To sue someone means to bring a person to court in order to obtain money from that person. The state can file criminal charges against a person. To 'file' these charges means the accusations against a person are now official and the person must appear in court. So basically 'charges' means the claim that a person has committed a crime.
espionage - spying; obtaining secret information and providing it to those who are not supposed to have it.
a leaker - someone who reveals secret information. If you have a cup and it leaks, water comes out when it is not supposed to.
prosecutors - these are lawyers for the state who try to prove that people accused of crimes are guilty.
a sealed criminal complaint - this means that the people cannot read the complaint; it is a secret complaint. a 'complaint' is the list of things a person supposedly did which supposedly broke the law.
classified - secret. Classified information is only supposed to be seen by certain people in government.
an unauthorized person - someone who wasn't supposed to see classified information.
to detain - to stop a person from leaving; to keep a person in custody
provisional - it can be changed later
an arrest warrant - an official document that gives the police the right and ability to take a person into custody (to detain him).
a contractor for the NSA - he worked for a company which worked for the government.
a three-count complaint - supposedly he committed three crimes.
willful communication - he deliberately communicated secrets - he didn't accidentally co0mmunicate secrets.
to be outspoken - to have a strong opinion and to express it forcefully.
treason, treasonous - to do something to harm your country.
take him into custody - this is when the police arrest a person and take him to the police station.
to extradite him - to force him to leave Hong Kong and to come back to the United States to face justice.
disclosures - stuff he revealed, stuff he told the newspapers about.
to ignite - to start something. When you start a fire you ignite a fire.
to disrupt - to mess up; to stop something from happening.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you like this blog and are benefitting from it, please consider buying my e-book on amazon. It's a lot of fun and has really good vocabulary words and reading passages in it. You'll also learn a lot about New York City and America through this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS
If you want a free copy of the book, please e-mail me at djg51qu@gmail.com
I will be happy to send you a copy via Word attachment. Please let me know whether you have Word 2010 or I should use an earlier version (like 2007 etc.)
Welcome to an excellent, FREE resource to improve your English! I'm Daniel Gauss - MA Teachers College at Columbia University - at danielgauss31@gmail.com. If you add me at https://www.facebook.com/dgauss3 you'll get updates to this blog. (Google + works too.)
Showing posts with label cia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cia. Show all posts
Friday, June 21, 2013
Saturday, March 2, 2013
"Argo" and The Iranian Hostage Crisis
The movie Argo won the "Oscar" award for the best movie of 2012 recently.
This has created some controversy because the nation of Iran feels that the movie portrays its history inaccurately.
Here is a good link about the period of time in Iranian and US relations that the movie is about. This link provides a pretty objective account of what happened. Basically from the 1950s through 1970s the US government supported the corrupt Shah of Iran against the will of the Iranian people.
When there was a revolution in the late 1970s, the US president - Jimmy Carter - probably should have supported the people of Iran, but he supported the corrupt Shah instead. The Shah was forced out of office and the US and Iran have had terrible relations since then.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/ americanexperience/features/ general-article/carter- hostage-crisis/
Vocabulary to help you read the article:
a controversy - a controversial issue is one about which there is heated (passionate, emotional) debate or argument
to portray s/t (s/t = something) - to reveal or show something
objective - not 'subjective,' if a piece of news is objective, it tries to tell the truth about the situation directly, without favoring one side or the other; something objective is non-biased
corrupt - not honest; a corrupt politician is not trying to be of service to others - he/she tries to profit for him/herself
Shah - the title of the ex-leader of Iran; he was like a president or prime minister etc.
the will of the people - what the people want
a hostage -someone held by someone or others against his/her will; a captive
a crisis - a difficult situation that could lead to tragedy
a mob - a large group of people
to overrun - basically, to run over; if something is overrun by people, lots of people 'attack' something and take it over
to seize - to take control of
an oath - a formal promise
concentrated - focused
a dominant role - the main role
to stay on the sidelines - to just stand by and watch
advocating - encouraging, arguing for
charismatic - charming, likable
to oust - to get rid of, to eliminate
CIA - Central Intelligence Agency
to consolidate power - to centralize power and make it stronger
unprecedented prosperity - wealth that has never been experienced before
resentment - bad feelings
a confrontation - when two people or parties face each other in some type of conflict situation
clergy - religious people
to flee - to run away ---> flee, flew, flown
exile - to go into exile means to be forced to leave your home country for another
to toast s/o - to raise a glass of alcohol to someone and say something nice
as opposition mounted - as the number of people opposing something grew or became larger
to crack down on dissenters - to crackdown on means to get tougher with, to try to stop, to try to oppress. If the government cracks down on a certain type of crime, they are trying to stop that crime
fueling more resentment - causing more bad feelings
to denounce - to say something is wrong
to inherit s/t - to receive something from someone before you. If a relative dies, you might inherit some of his/her money
to heed advice - to follow advice
to suppress s/t - to try to stop something
to be reluctant to do s/t - to not really want to do something
a reprisal - an act of revenge, to hurt someone who has hurt you
to relent - to give in, to agree to do something you don't want to do
the room fell dead - the room became quiet
a retinue - followers
potent - powerful
to vow - to promise
the plight of s/o - the problems of someone
to embargo s/t - to stop buying something
oppression - force which stop something; political oppression is a type of force which is meant to harm some group or individual
sanctions - regulations that stop trade with a country
to freeze assets - to stop Iran from getting their money from US banks
to rally around s/o or s/t - to support someone; initially people supported Carter
mine the harbors - put explosive devices in the harbors to blow-up Iranian ships
to feel devastated - to feel terrible, to feel a sense of loss
to abort a mission - to stop a mission
gleeful - happy
stark - strong
impotence - weakness
multiple sclerosis - a type of disease
dispiriting - demoralizing, making a person lose hope or enthusiasm
a backdrop - the background
to thumb your nose at someone - to show contempt or hatred or disapproval
propaganda - positive stories (often in the news) told to promote the image of a government
chaotic - messy, not organized
to drag on - to take too long
a landslide victory - an easy and overwhelming victory
fraught with emotion - filled with emotion
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Why do you think this movie was made, even though the events portrayed were from 1979?
2) Do you think that Hollywood helps to promote American "propaganda"?
3) "Argo" was not one of the most popular movies of 2012 and there seem to be many historical inaccuracies. Why do you think this movie won the Oscar?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway.
http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS
If this page is useful to you, please buy the book (it's quite inexpensive and useful!!!!). If you don't have an e-reader, drop me a line at djg51qu@gmail.com and I'll send you a free copy via Word file. Let me know whether you have Word 2010 or an earlier version.
-----------------
Yes, I'm also the guy who created the scandal in Asia two years ago :P
http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100511000742
http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100512000682
http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/
This has created some controversy because the nation of Iran feels that the movie portrays its history inaccurately.
Here is a good link about the period of time in Iranian and US relations that the movie is about. This link provides a pretty objective account of what happened. Basically from the 1950s through 1970s the US government supported the corrupt Shah of Iran against the will of the Iranian people.
When there was a revolution in the late 1970s, the US president - Jimmy Carter - probably should have supported the people of Iran, but he supported the corrupt Shah instead. The Shah was forced out of office and the US and Iran have had terrible relations since then.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/
Vocabulary to help you read the article:
a controversy - a controversial issue is one about which there is heated (passionate, emotional) debate or argument
to portray s/t (s/t = something) - to reveal or show something
objective - not 'subjective,' if a piece of news is objective, it tries to tell the truth about the situation directly, without favoring one side or the other; something objective is non-biased
corrupt - not honest; a corrupt politician is not trying to be of service to others - he/she tries to profit for him/herself
Shah - the title of the ex-leader of Iran; he was like a president or prime minister etc.
the will of the people - what the people want
a hostage -someone held by someone or others against his/her will; a captive
a crisis - a difficult situation that could lead to tragedy
a mob - a large group of people
to overrun - basically, to run over; if something is overrun by people, lots of people 'attack' something and take it over
to seize - to take control of
an oath - a formal promise
concentrated - focused
a dominant role - the main role
to stay on the sidelines - to just stand by and watch
advocating - encouraging, arguing for
charismatic - charming, likable
to oust - to get rid of, to eliminate
CIA - Central Intelligence Agency
to consolidate power - to centralize power and make it stronger
unprecedented prosperity - wealth that has never been experienced before
resentment - bad feelings
a confrontation - when two people or parties face each other in some type of conflict situation
clergy - religious people
to flee - to run away ---> flee, flew, flown
exile - to go into exile means to be forced to leave your home country for another
to toast s/o - to raise a glass of alcohol to someone and say something nice
as opposition mounted - as the number of people opposing something grew or became larger
to crack down on dissenters - to crackdown on means to get tougher with, to try to stop, to try to oppress. If the government cracks down on a certain type of crime, they are trying to stop that crime
fueling more resentment - causing more bad feelings
to denounce - to say something is wrong
to inherit s/t - to receive something from someone before you. If a relative dies, you might inherit some of his/her money
to heed advice - to follow advice
to suppress s/t - to try to stop something
to be reluctant to do s/t - to not really want to do something
a reprisal - an act of revenge, to hurt someone who has hurt you
to relent - to give in, to agree to do something you don't want to do
the room fell dead - the room became quiet
a retinue - followers
potent - powerful
to vow - to promise
the plight of s/o - the problems of someone
to embargo s/t - to stop buying something
oppression - force which stop something; political oppression is a type of force which is meant to harm some group or individual
sanctions - regulations that stop trade with a country
to freeze assets - to stop Iran from getting their money from US banks
to rally around s/o or s/t - to support someone; initially people supported Carter
mine the harbors - put explosive devices in the harbors to blow-up Iranian ships
to feel devastated - to feel terrible, to feel a sense of loss
to abort a mission - to stop a mission
gleeful - happy
stark - strong
impotence - weakness
multiple sclerosis - a type of disease
dispiriting - demoralizing, making a person lose hope or enthusiasm
a backdrop - the background
to thumb your nose at someone - to show contempt or hatred or disapproval
propaganda - positive stories (often in the news) told to promote the image of a government
chaotic - messy, not organized
to drag on - to take too long
a landslide victory - an easy and overwhelming victory
fraught with emotion - filled with emotion
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Why do you think this movie was made, even though the events portrayed were from 1979?
2) Do you think that Hollywood helps to promote American "propaganda"?
3) "Argo" was not one of the most popular movies of 2012 and there seem to be many historical inaccuracies. Why do you think this movie won the Oscar?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway.
http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS
If this page is useful to you, please buy the book (it's quite inexpensive and useful!!!!). If you don't have an e-reader, drop me a line at djg51qu@gmail.com and I'll send you a free copy via Word file. Let me know whether you have Word 2010 or an earlier version.
-----------------
Yes, I'm also the guy who created the scandal in Asia two years ago :P
http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100511000742
http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100512000682
http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Torture Does Not Work
After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States used various torture techniques to extract information from terrorist suspects. All of these techniques were illegal and, according to experts on intelligence extraction, ineffective.
For instance, Khalil Sheik Mohammed, the "mastermind" behind the 9/11 attacks, was captured and tortured using a technique called "water-boarding." According to this technique, a person is made to feel as if he is drowning until he reveals information. The CIA did this to him over 180 times.
Did they obtain useful information? No. KSM admitted to having committed every act of terrorism from the past 20 years to try to avoid further torture. Obviously, he could not have done everything he admitted to, but he freely admitted to doing everything under torture. Therefore, torture always seems to provide "misinformation."
In the American newspapers it was (ridiculously) reported that he had been involved in virtually every major terrorist action of his generation.
Furthermore, because he had been tortured, he could not be brought to trial in the United States - where a judge might have dismissed his case (eliminated his case) because of the barbaric treatment shown toward him. He has been given a "military" trial, which is, basically, an unfair type of trial where there is no doubt that the defendant will be found guilty.
Now there is a movie called Zero Dark Thirty which plans to profit from the attack on Osama bin Laden's compound and the killing of bin Laden by US Navy Seals. The only problem is that, according to Senator John McCain (a man who had been tortured), the scene in the film where the CIA gets useful information due to torture is inaccurate.
http://news.msn.com/politics/mccain-rejects-torture-scene-in-zero-dark-thirty
1) Do you think that torture works?
2) Can torture ever be ethical?
3) Do you think the CIA was "right" in using torture so frequently?
4) Why do you think these filmmakers used a scene in the movie in which torture "worked," when, in reality, torture did not work?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/
Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS
For instance, Khalil Sheik Mohammed, the "mastermind" behind the 9/11 attacks, was captured and tortured using a technique called "water-boarding." According to this technique, a person is made to feel as if he is drowning until he reveals information. The CIA did this to him over 180 times.
Did they obtain useful information? No. KSM admitted to having committed every act of terrorism from the past 20 years to try to avoid further torture. Obviously, he could not have done everything he admitted to, but he freely admitted to doing everything under torture. Therefore, torture always seems to provide "misinformation."
In the American newspapers it was (ridiculously) reported that he had been involved in virtually every major terrorist action of his generation.
Furthermore, because he had been tortured, he could not be brought to trial in the United States - where a judge might have dismissed his case (eliminated his case) because of the barbaric treatment shown toward him. He has been given a "military" trial, which is, basically, an unfair type of trial where there is no doubt that the defendant will be found guilty.
Now there is a movie called Zero Dark Thirty which plans to profit from the attack on Osama bin Laden's compound and the killing of bin Laden by US Navy Seals. The only problem is that, according to Senator John McCain (a man who had been tortured), the scene in the film where the CIA gets useful information due to torture is inaccurate.
http://news.msn.com/politics/mccain-rejects-torture-scene-in-zero-dark-thirty
1) Do you think that torture works?
2) Can torture ever be ethical?
3) Do you think the CIA was "right" in using torture so frequently?
4) Why do you think these filmmakers used a scene in the movie in which torture "worked," when, in reality, torture did not work?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/
Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

