Showing posts with label esl teacher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label esl teacher. Show all posts

Friday, January 19, 2018

People in Chile express their disgust toward the Catholic Church as the Pope arrives

{{{A sarcastic cartoon about how the Catholic Church has failed to protect children from sexually abusive priests. Obviously, there has been more than just one victim, there have been thousands throughout the world.}}}

It seems that many people in Chile are outraged by the number of Chilean Catholic priests who have sexually attacked children. They expressed this anger at the Pope when he visited Chile.

Article about this issue:

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/01/19/in-chile-pope-met-by-protests-threats-burned-churches.html

Vocabulary to help you understand the article:

a protest - when a large group of people meet publicly because they are upset about something. This group expresses its anger or outrage, usually peacefully. If a protest becomes violent it is often called a riot.

a threat - a statement that someone makes to indicate that he intends to hurt another person

papal - relating to the pope. The pope is the leader of the Catholic Church.

wept - cried, to weep = weep, wept, wept

hostility - anger

anti-pope - people against the pope; pro-pope would be people in favor of the pope

tear gas - a type of gas police around the world use which hurts the eyes of protesters or rioters and often produces tears

pamphlets - little booklets

cassock - the robe he wears

unprecedented - it has never happened before

friction - conflict, anger caused by disagreement with something

a fluke - something uncommon, something that just happened once and won't happen again

a harbinger - something which indicates that something will happen again or even over and over again; like a prediction

to ban demonstrations - Peru will not let people gather because the government is afraid they will express anger toward the pope as well.

to impact the image of the country - Peru is afraid that Peru will look bad in the eyes of the world if people demonstrate against (protest against) the pope.

to condemn - to attack something verbally and to strongly say it is wrong

condoms - those rubber birth control devices used by men...the Catholic Church has declared that it is wrong for men to use condoms. The Church says the condoms kill sperm cells. 

ferocity - extreme aggression; if a dog is ferocious, it will attack and seriously hurt a person.

theology - the study of God

changed radically - changed completely

a pedophile priest - a priest who enjoys thinking of having sex with children

a bungled response - to bungle something means to mess things up; not to handle things as well as you should have

to accelerate - to speed up

contested - to contest something is to oppose it, to argue against it

notorious - famous for the wrong reasons

to sour in regard to something - if a person becomes soured on/in regard to something, he used to have favorable feelings about that thing but now feels bad about it. i.e. At first our boss seemed like a nice guy, but under pressure he snaps and becomes very angry. The whole office has soured against him.

were torched - were set on fire

arson attacks - arson is when a building is started on fire

indigenous - the first people of an area, the people of Chile whose ancestors lived there before the Europeans

ancestral lands - the territory of their ancestors was taken away from them years ago

discrimination - when people are not allowed rights because of their identity. Remember, prejudice is an attitude while discrimination is action.

his homily - a speech a priest gives during a religious service

to take someone to task - to blame someone

an elegant agreement - an agreement that looks good but does not mean anything

a tactic - something done as part of a larger strategy, something done to get someone else to do something you want them to do

employed by - used by

a radical group - usually a far leftist group, a group that is anti-capitalist or pro-socialist or strongly anti-government

to be disgruntled - a disgruntled person is an unhappy person, a person very upset because things are wrong and they are not changing

moral authority - to have moral authority is to be recognized as a good person with power who has a right to tell other people what they should do

to celebrate mass - to hold a Catholic religious service, a Catholic religious service is called a mass

LGBT - lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender

a socialist - someone who does not believe in capitalism, someone who believes that wealth should be shared among everyone in a society

to be resolved - to be taken care off satisfactorily

an accomplice - someone who helps a criminal to do something. So the protesters are accusing the Church of helping priests who were attacking children

overshadowed his visit - if something overshadows something else it shows itself to be more significant or important then what is supposed to be important

a protege - someone coached or guided by someone else

slanderous - when a statement is deliberately (not accidentally) untrue and meant to hurt the reputation of another person

proof - evidence that something actually happened, something which shows that something really happened

his reception - his greeting, the way people would receive him





Sunday, September 27, 2015

Can you get these 12 useful, common words?

   
Fill-in-the-blanks

cockroaches, to suck, an election, quid pro quo, a scumbag, prestigious, absurd, remote, ballistic, fishy, to sponsor, moral


Joe told me about a plan he had to make a lot of money for both of us, but the plan seemed _____________ to me and I rejected it.

Mary had a dilemma: she could go to a pretty good school on a full scholarship or a ____________ school but only by taking out a lot of loans.

I tend to avoid going to see Hollywood films and I go to see films from around the world. Yes, Hollywood films are generally bad so I would say that they ___________.

One of the first problems you might experience in a New York City apartment is ________________. These ugly and annoying bugs seem to be everywhere.

There are many talented foreigners who come to the USA who hope to find permanent jobs here. They need to find employers who will ________________ them for green cards, however, and not many companies want to support immigrant workers  to this expensive level.

When Bill told his father that he had crashed his dad’s car into a tree, Bill expected his father to go _________________. Instead, his dad began crying.

Roger was a very handsome guy and women were always flirting with him. He was very ______________ however, and felt it would be wrong to cheat on his wife.

I expected this lawyer to help me, but he turned out to be a _________________. He was  totally unethical and was charging me for work he never did and then he threatened to sue me when I complained!

Many Americans look forward to the next presidential ______________ which will be held in 2016. They are hoping for fresh ideas and new vision.

After 15 years in New York City I really began to hate this place. I started to think of living in a ____________ area far from any cities.

Life seems dominated by _________________ relationships. People are always offering to help you so that you will have to help them later. Or they will help you only if you promise to help them later.

Matt seemed kind of nuts. He claimed to be a police officer and a spy, but I found his stories to be ________________.



Answers:


fishy, 
prestigious, 
suck, 
cockroaches, 
sponsor, 
ballistic, 
moral, 
scumbag, 
election,  
remote, 
quid pro quo, 
absurd

Friday, April 11, 2014

Some Russian lawmakers want to investigate and prosecute Gorby


Gorbachev was the last leader of the Soviet Union. Under his leadership the Soviet Union became Russia and all of the smaller countries that had made up the Soviet Union became independent states.  Basically, Gorbachev ended the system of 'communism' in Russia and allowed the Soviet Union to break up into smaller states.

Now some members of Russia's Congress (the Duma) want Gorbachev to be investigated and arrested because they believe that he destroyed something amazing. Of course, all of this happened from 1989 to 1991, and it is now 2014.

Here is an article about this topic:

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/lawmakers-want-gorbachev-investigated-over-collapse-of-soviet-union/497838.html

Vocabulary to help you understand the article:

to collapse - when something falls apart or falls down, it collapses

pro-Kremlin - they support 'the Kremlin' (basically they support Vladimir Putin). 'anti' means against

a faction - a political group with a particular belief system

a prosecutor - someone who takes 'criminals' to court to try to punish them for the benefit of society

dissolution - break up

illegitimate - not lawful, wrong, not genuine

thorough - complete (pronounced THUR oh)

reaping - after you sow (plant) seeds, the seeds grow and then you reap (cut down and gather) the crop (the fruit or vegetable). To reap something is to get the consequences of something

hardline - uncompromising; if someone is a hardliner, he/she refuses to change his/her opinion and has extremely strong beliefs

a coup - when the military tries to take over the government

-------------------
Yes, I'm the English teacher who caused the huge scandal in Asia:

http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100511000742

http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100512000682

Monday, February 4, 2013

Real-Life Horror Story in Alabama: 5 Year-Old Hostage

Alabama is one of the US states in the southern part of the country.  In this state there is a real-life horror story happening.

Last week, for unknown reasons, a 65 year-old man walked up to a school bus, shot the driver and kidnapped a 5 year-old boy from the bus.  He then took the 5 year-old boy to his property and went into a bunker with the boy.  A bunker is an underground room.  Many farms or rural (country-side) properties have bunkers so that people can go into a safe place if there is a tornado or other disaster.

Police have surrounded the bunker, but they are unable to get into it to save the child.  They speak to the man through a pipe every day to try to convince him to allow the child to go.  He is refusing to do so. (The child is a "hostage" in this situation - a person being used to protect the person who is the kidnapper.)

Apparently the man has enough food in the bunker to last several weeks.  There is only one entrance to the bunker and if the man hears the police coming, he will shoot the child.  He has been in this bunker for 7 days now with this poor child.

Nobody is sure why he did this.

http://news.yahoo.com/details-emerge-man-center-ala-standoff-164731458.html

Update:  They stormed the bunker and saved the child.  The kidnapper was killed.

http://start.toshiba.com/news/read.php?rip_id=%3CDA4854GO2%40news.ap.org%3E&ps=1018&page=2

1)  What do you think the police in Alabama should do about this situation?

2)  What do you think were this man's motives?

3)  Based on the reading, what type of person is this man?

4) Do you think they took too long to attack the bunker?

------------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who created the scandal in Asia two years ago :P

http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100511000742

http://nwww.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20100512000682

http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/

Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway
http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS

Friday, February 1, 2013

Soccer/Football Players Are "Smarter" Than University Students?

Here's an interesting article that points out that playing various types of sports can improve a person's mental alertness.  Football players (or soccer players as we call them in the USA) have more advanced mental abilities in regard to certain mental tasks.

Unfortunately, the report does not seem to indicate whether playing sports will also make a person more creative, or better at math, or more insightful.  If "alertness" is the only benefit, sports might not be worth pursuing as a means to help improve one's mind. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2271411/Premiership-footballers-sharper-average-uni-student-Hyper-focus-gives-elite-sportsmen-mental-edge.html

1)  Does this report seem to indicate that more physical education programs are necessary in our schools?

2)  Do you think that the mental or cognitive achievement players get by playing sports can help them in any meaningful field of life?  Or is this kind of a wasted intellectual potential that is only really useful in a sport?

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Does John Galliano Deserve a Second Chance?

In 2011 a drunken John Galliano stated that he liked Hitler and seemingly indicated that he wished two Jewish ladies (who were speaking to him at a bar) and their families had been killed during the Holocaust.  For this Galliano lost his job at Dior and was convicted of criminal offenses in France.

Now, Oscar de la Renta is offering him a temporary position at his enterprise.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/fashion/2013/jan/18/john-galliano-comeback

1)  Based on what Galliano did, do you think he deserves a second chance?

2)  Galliano seems to be saying that "alcohol" was doing the talking, and not him.  What do you think?

3)  Do you think he is truly sorry?

4)  In American sports, people seem to have short-term memories.  Kobe Bryant was arrested for rape and seemed to "settle" the case out of court with a monetary payment to the potential victim, and he has continued playing basketball.  Michael Vick engaged in bloody and deadly 'dog fighting' activities, spent two years in jail and then was rehired by an NFL team.  Do you think people in the fashion world have such short-term memories as well?  Why is this?

5)  Would you ever financially support anything John Galliano is involved with?

-------------------
Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P
http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/

Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway
http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Los Angeles Police "Buy Back" Guns

Many American big cities have "buy back" days for guns.

This means that people can hand over any type of gun they have to the police, and the police will give them money or a gift card.  In the case of Los Angeles, the police gave away giftcards to people willing to hand in guns that they own. The guns may be legal or illegal.

This is allowed anonymously - the police do not ask any questions. They just take the gun and hand out the money or cards.

http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/ci_22262112/lapds-gun-buyback-off-busy-start-van-nuys?source=rss

1)  Why do you think people are willing to hand in their guns even though they might not get the full value of money for the gun back?

2)  Some people criticize this program and say that "criminals" are being rewarded by being given money for their illegal guns.  Others say this is a good way to get guns out of the hands of more people.  What do you think?

3)  An opponent of gun control said that in gun buy-backs, criminals do not hand in their guns, but honest law-abiding people do.  Do you think this argument makes sense or do you think this person has an innacurate perception of the situation?

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Happy Birthday Baby Mithras? Jesus? What????!!

Is Christmas really Christmas?  No. 

Here's the guy who was really born on December 25th, the day after the third day that the sun seems to hover moribund on the horizon.


In the early history of the Catholic Church, Christianity struggled against a religion called Mithraism. A huge number of Romans were followers of Mithras at the time when the Christian religion was developing.

The central figure of Mithraism was Mithras, a sun god, and he was born on December 25th. He promised eternal life. His followers ate bread and drank wine in their services. Every reputable scholar points out that, yes, Mithras' birthday was December 25th, well before the Church declared Jesus's birthday to be December 25th. 

Why December 25th? December 22,23,24 are the shortest days of the year with the sun just hovering weakly over the horizon, looking dead. On December 25th, it is as if the sun is born again as the days begin to lengthen and the sun seems to move higher in the sky each day.

Apparently the Church declared that Jesus's birthday was on December 25th in order to effectively compete with Mithraism.  This sounds strange?  Yes!  It is strange, but it is supported by scholarship.

It turns out that every major Christian holiday - especially Easter and Christmas - was established on a big "pagan" or pre-Christian holiday.  Scholars believe this was a deliberate act by the Church to compete with the non-Christian religions and to replace those religions.  Merry Mithramas.

Don't believe me?  Here is the ground-breaking research by an amazing scholar:

http://www.mysterium.com/mithras.html

Merry Mithrasmas!!!!!!!!  Happy Birthday Baby Mithras!!!!!
Check out the short video:



-----------------------------------------




Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Controversial Michigan "Right-to-Work" Law

Labor unions have played an important role in American history and have helped to ensure that workers are treated fairly and receive adequate wages.  However, there has recently been a backlash (a negative reaction) against labor unions in various US states.  It is often felt that unions have received too many benefits for their workers and that the high wages unions expect for their workers are actually harming the businesses that employ the workers.

In Michigan a law was just passed to ensure that workers are not "forced" to join unions.  Basically, as part of many union agreements with businesses, once a worker is hired, money is auotmatically taken from the worker's paycheck and sent to the union as the worker's union dues or union fees.  So workers automatically become union members when they are hired at some companies.

The "right-to-work" law states that workers can no longer automatically be registered as union workers once they are hired for a job.  Workers must actively "choose" to join a union.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57558337/the-big-union-fight-in-michigan-explained/?tag=nl.e875&s_cid=e875

1)  Whose side are you on?  The union side or the business side?

2)  What do you think of this law?

3)  If you were hired as a worker and automatically enrolled in a union, with money taken from your check to pay for the union fees, how would you feel?

4)  What role do unions play in your home country?

5)  Do you think that unions are now "out of control" and harming business more than helping it?

------------------------------------


Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/

Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Virgin Mobile U.S. Ad (Stupidly) Seems to Joke About Rape

Even in the 21st century, in America, where women have made huge achievements and are approaching full equality of opportunity, rights, power and income with men, we still see absolutely STUPID instances of sexism and the hatred of women in advertising.

Virgin Mobile USA was running an ad which seemed to joke about the issue of rape.  Virgin Mobile is owned by Sprint/Nextel.   

Basically, in the ad, a man is considering whether he should buy "chloroform" (a chemical that causes a person to lose his/her consciousness) to use on a woman he knows.  The implication is clearly that by chloroforming this woman, he will be able to rape her easily.

http://now.msn.com/virgin-mobile-us-kills-ad-that-seems-to-condone-rape

1)  Virgin Mobile claims they did not know about this ad.  Do you believe them?

2)  Does seeing an ad like this make you angry?  How angry? 

3)  After seeing an ad like this, how influenced are you to change your judgment of a company?  Would you consider not buying a Virgin Mobile product because of such a terrible ad?  Honestly, why WOULD a woman ever buy a Virgin Mobile product again?  It seems that Sprint/Nextel owns Virgin Mobile.  If you are a woman, would you be inclined to buy a Sprint/Nextel product when they joke about an issue like rape?

4)  Many people immediately went online to protest this ad.  Does this seem to indicate to you that normal people, in general, are fed up with sexism and will not tolerate this type of joke?  Should we be proud of ourselves, so to speak, that ordinary people forced this company to take down this disgusting ad?

5)  Should executives at Virgin Mobile be held accountable (punished) for this attack against women?


------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/

Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS

US Supreme Court Examines "Gay Marriage Ban"

More than half of the states in the US have banned gay marriage.  Other states, including New York, have made gay marriage legal.  Interestingly, California, which is known as a liberal state, has banned gay marriage.

Even in states where gay marriage is legal, however, same-sex couples do not receive the types of benefits from the US government which heterosexual couples receive.  Therefore the US Supreme Court will determine whether states can ban same-sex marriages and whether or not homosexual couples should receive the same types of benefits as heterosexual couples.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/09/us-usa-court-gaymarriage-idUSBRE8B617420121209

1)  How do you feel about the issue of gay marriage?

2)  If a state has banned gay marriage, do you think the Supreme Court should have a right to overturn their laws?

3)  How are gay people generally treated in your country?

4)  If gay people are hesitant to 'come out' in your home country, do you think that laws are necessary to protect their rights?

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Illegal Immigrant Numbers Drop in The USA

There are currently 11 million illegal immigrants in the USA.  About 80% of the illegal immigrants are from Mexico and other Latin American countries.  Yet, for various reasons, it looks as if illegal immigration is dropping and may continue to drop.  Indeed, Asians supplanted Latinos as the number one immigrant group (legal immigrants) for this past year.

http://news.yahoo.com/illegal-immigration-drops-decade-long-rise-050220584.html

1)  What do you believe should be done in regard to the 11 million illegal immigrants who are currently in the USA?  Should they be offered citizenship?  Under which terms?

2)  Illegal immigrants who are very young and who wish to attend US colleges and universities have been allowed to stay in the USA.  What do you think of this "Dream Act"?

3)  In general, do you have any opinion about the current US immigration policy?  How might it be changed for the better of people in general and the country?

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Be A Human Being First, A Photographer Second

Yesterday I posted a link to an article about a man who was pushed onto subway tracks by another man in New York City, and especially about the New York Post's decision to publish a photo of a man (the man who had been pushed) just as he was about to be killed.

Today much of America is talking about the person who took the photograph.  Most people are condemning his actions, although he has been given the opportunity to try to explain why he did what he did. 

Many times, when I see a photo of someone suffering or people suffering in a remote part of the world, I wonder about the motives of the photographer to take the photo and my own motives to look at it.

http://news.msn.com/us/photog-in-nyc-subway-death-responds-to-ethical-criticisms

1) How do you feel about this photographer?

2) Do you think that "news" photographers around the world serve an important purpose or do you feel they are making a living from other people's suffering?

3)  Do you believe the photographer's excuse, in the above story, that he was too far away from the person to help him, so all he could do was take a photo?

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Newark New Jersey Mayor Living on "Food Stamps"

"Food stamps" are not really "stamps."  They used to be stamps but now a person who receives "food stamps" receives a type of debit card which he/she can use at a super market or grocery store to get free food.

The Mayor of Newark, New Jersey wants people to focus on the issue of food stamps, so he is going to try to survive for one week by just using the average amount of money that an average food stamp user uses.  That comes to about $5 per day.  By the way, this does not necessarily mean that people are expected to live on $5 per day for food.  Many food stamp users have a source of income, but it is quite low, so they are often able to add to this small sum or other people in the family also receive food stamps so they can "pool" their resources.  Very poor people also often take advantage of free food give-aways at local churches and social services programs.  Nevertheless, the Mayor will be living on about $5 a day (for food) for one week.

Apparently he wants people in America to be more aware of how little the government is providing to poor people for food.  Many people attack the "food stamps" program as being wasteful or too generous.  This mayor wants to show that people can buy very little with what they receive.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2012/12/04/booker-food-stamps-newark/1745451/

1)  How do you feel about this gesture?

2)  Do you think that more money should be provided to poor people for food?  This will, of course, mean higher taxes for everyone else.

3)  The Mayor of Newark will be running for Governor soon.  Do you think he is trying to generate positive publicity for himself, or based on the article, do you think he truly cares about the poor?

4)  Do you think there should be a limit of time that a person may use food stamps, or should there be a requirement that the person looks for or obtains work?

Monday, December 3, 2012

Fake Homeless Man "Scams" NY Police Officer for Free Boots

There was a story that was in many newspapers around the world last week, concerning a NY City police officer who saw a man lying on a sidewalk with no shoes on his feet.  When this happened it was freezing cold outside and the officer went into a shoe store and bought shoes for the homeless man.

Yet, there seemed to be something strange about the story to me.  The apparently homeless man was deliberately lying in front of a shoe store in Times Square with no shoes.  To me, it seemed as if he was trying to make tourists feel sorry enough for him so that they might actually go in the store and buy him a pair of shoes or at least give him some money.  The fact that this "homeless" guy was deliberately sitting on the ground without shoes seemed a deliberate ploy (scheme, plan) to make people feel sorry enough for him that they might give him something.

This is what the cop did.

Now, there is a new story that the "homeless" man has been seen around the city without shoes again!  Therefore, it seems that the "homeless" man really does not need shoes, but merely takes his shoes off to trick or fool cops and tourists into giving him money and shoes.

This is called a "scam."  This is when someone tricks another person into giving him/her money.  On the subways there are lots of these scams.  Women will sometimes even bring children onto the subway and claim they are homeless and hungry to get people to give them money.

What is shocking to me is that the City of New York actively warns people NOT to give any money to any beggars.  There are about 100 free food programs in New York City and many free clothing programs.  There are also homeless shelters where the homeless may go.  The City of New York points out that if a beggar is asking for money, he/she probably wants it for drugs or alcohol.  Help is available in New York to anyone who wants it.

So basically, the cop wanted to be a good samaritan, but became a scam victim instead.  He did not follow the advice his own government bosses give to people about giving things to beggars.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50052716/ns/us_news-the_new_york_times

New Story!!!!  The "homeless" guy is not even homeless.  Basically, and I am sorry to say this, this news makes the NY police officer really seem ridiculous.  He totally got scammed. Even though the city warns people not to give money to beggars, he did so.

http://news.msn.com/us/shoeless-nyc-man-isnt-homeless-after-all

1)  Do you agree with my theory?

2)  Does this make the cop look foolish to you, or is he still a hero?

3)  Do you provide money to beggars on the subway?  Why or why not?

4)  Do you provide money to street musicians on the streets?

-------------------------------------------------------


Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS




Sunday, December 2, 2012

Is The US Military Abusing The "WikiLeaks" Soldier?

A while ago a low-ranking US soldier took many secret documents and sent them to the website WikiLeaks to reveal what the US military was doing in its two foreign wars.

This soldier was arrested and is being held in a military prison until his trial.  His attorney claims that this young man is being abused by the US military.  The abuse includes keeping him naked and isolated in a prison cell 23 to 24 hours a day.

Here is an article about this: http://news.yahoo.com/counselor-mannings-history-showed-self-harm-risk-175239354.html

1)  Do you think this soldier was a hero or a villain?

2)  Do you feel that he is being abused by the US military?  The military claims that they took away his clothes to keep him from killing himself, but he claims he is being punished for not talking to prison authorities.

3)  Do you think the US government is justified in bringing him to trial for handing over the secrets to Wikileaks?  Do you think this soldier was trying to stop the wars or do you think he had other motives?  What do you think his ulterior (other, hidden) motives might have been?

4)  The United States would also like to put the founder of WikiLeaks on trial.  What do you think of this situation? 

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Actress Attempts to Remove Hate-Filled Film from Youtube


The movie "Innocence of Muslims" became one of the most controversial films of the year when it caused protests in various Muslim countries.

One of the actresses in the film attempted to have the film removed from youtube because she said that the director lied to her about the nature of the film, and dubbed (replaced) new lines over the lines she spoke.  Therefore, she stated that her life was now in danger because it appears that she makes many statements attacking Islam.

Unfortunately, a judge refused to allow this film to be removed from youtube.

There are, of course, limits to "free speech."  A person cannot make deliberately false statements about another person or use speech to cause violence.  The judge, apparently, however, felt that the film was protected by the 1st Amendment.

Interestingly, President Obama asked that the film be removed from youtube even if it was protected by the right to freedom of speech.  It is up to each web site as to whether it allows "controversial" material, and most web sites will voluntarily remove hate-filled and malicious content for the good of the community.  Google (which owns youtube) refused to do this.

http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=777707

1)  Do you think that Google should have removed this video even if it is protected by the 1st Amendment right to freedom of expression? After all, the film is truly badly written, edited and directed and presents false and hate-filled messages about a religion.

2)  Do you think that Google is "required" somehow to present anything that anyone posts?  For instance, here's an analogy:  Let's say you own a bookstore and an author comes in and tries to encourage you to sell copies of his book which seems to be attacking a religion or religious figure in a hate-filled manner.  He assures you that the book is protected by the First Amendment and that many copies of the book can be sold.  Would you sell that type of book?

3)  Why do you think Google refused to remove the video even though the president of the US asked them to?  Some people feel that Google is more interested in profits than the 1st Amendment and does not want to spend money monitoring or policing or removing negative content from their search engine and youtube. For instance, an argument might be that it  might cost a great deal of money to hire an appropriate staff to remove "objectionable" content from the Google search engine and youtube.  Google may not want to spend this money.

4)  Do you think the actress was right to ask that the film be removed because it makes her seem anti-Islamic?

5)  Do you think the sometimes violent protests against this film were justified?

6)  Did you see the film?  What is your response to this film? If you did not see the film/video, why didn't you watch it?

Friday, November 30, 2012

A Mother Inherits Her Dead Son's Debt, and Asks for Its Cancellation

Foreign students often learn how expensive American tuition is when they consider coming over to the USA to study.  Indeed, as foreign students, they are charged even higher rates.

Many American students have to borrow money in order to attend college and graduate school.  After college is over, they are expected to pay back these loans, little by little, month after month. Sometimes this takes years, and the student is forced to pay back a huge, extra amount of money in the form of "interest."

However, the loan organizations have acquired a terrible reputation.   If a student falls behind in his/her payments, they often harass the student, the student's family and sometimes acquaintances of the student, in an attempt to get their money back.  (This type of harassment if often illegal and the loan organizations or their collection agencies can be sued.)

In the following story, a mother co-signed for a student loan for her son.  This meant that the mother agreed that if the son could not pay the loan back, she would assume responsibility for it.  Then, after the son graduated, unfortunately, at a very young age, the son died.

The mother then became responsible for paying back the son's debts for which she had co-signed (equalling tens of thousands of dollars).  The Federal Government released her from the obligation to pay the debt back (he had taken some loans from the US government), but a private company which gave a large loan to her and her child is expecting their money back.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/11/mother-inherits-dead-sons-student-loans-petitions-to-have-them-forgiven/

1)  Do you feel that this private loan company should cancel the debt owed by the dead son?

2)  Some people feel that the mother should have to pay the money back because 1: She co-signed for the loan and 2: The son accepted and used the money. The son spent four years studying at a college with this money. 

Furthermore, this loan organization is a business and they cannot operate unless they receive their loan money back with some interest.  How do you feel about this?

3)  Some people seem to be upset that the Federal Government cancelled the loan payments upon the death of the son.  People point out that the tax dollars of Americans went to pay for her son's tuition, he used that money, and the government should receive the money back.  How do you feel about this?

4)  If you had to take out a massive amount of loan money to pay for your education, would you do it? 

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Obese Woman Dies, Unable To Board Plane Home

A 400 lbs (182 kg) woman was able to fly via a Dutch airline to Hungary, from America, but several problems prevented 3 airlines from helping her fly back home.  Unable to fly home, she then died, and her husband is blaming the airlines for her death.  He seems to be arguing that had the airlines found a way home for her, her American doctors would have saved her.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/husband-obese-woman-blames-airlines-death-european-vacation/story?id=17812883

1)  Do you think the Dutch airline is to blame for this situation?  After all, they got her to Europe and were supposed to get her back home again.

2)  To what extent do you feel she is to blame for her excessive weight?

3)  Two other airlines attempted to help her get back home, but were unable to.  The husband wants to sue them as well.  Do you feel they are to blame?

4)  If you were on a jury for this case, would you find the airlines guilty or not guilty?

5)  Do you think that airlines should even accomodate passengers who are in such poor health and dangerously overweight?

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

"Jocks" Protect High School Girl From Bullying

In American schools, bullying used to be openly tolerated by teachers and school administrators.  Basically, if a boy was being bullied, teachers would blame him for being "weak" and for not "standing up for himself."  This was the attitude even though virtually all bullies pick on students who are not as physically strong as they are.

This attitude was forced to change, somewhat, after the Columbine High School shootings. 

http://history1900s.about.com/od/famouscrimesscandals/a/columbine.htm

Apparently two boys became upset by the constant bullying they faced from "jocks" (athletes) and planned a vindictive shooting spree as a result.

The following article shows that bullying still seems to be a problem in US high schools,  although in this case the "jocks" are protecting a young woman from being bullied.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highschool-prep-rally/arizona-student-special-needs-avoids-bullies-protection-football-112516229.html

1)  How bad is bullying in your home country's schools?

2)  What do teachers and administrators do about bullying in your home country?

3)  What do you think should be done about bullying?

4)  In the above article, members of the school's football team have to protect a young woman from bullies.  Do you think this is necessary?  What do you think of a school administration where the football team has to protect students and not staff or teachers?

---------------------------------


Yes, I'm the guy who caused the "scandal" in Asia two years ago :P http://www.shoutcastblog.com/2010/05/11/wondergirls-were-mistreated-by-jyp-entertainment/

Yes, I'm also the guy who wrote the very funny ESL book: New York City Sucks, But You'll Wanna Live Here Anyway http://www.amazon.com/Sucks-Youll-Wanna-Anyway-ebook/dp/B004TSPAQS